Congressional Spending & The Impact To Savers

%POST_TITLE% Thumbnail

by: Cory Carlton

In recent months, Congress has been busy debating new tax and spending packages as part of President Biden’s Build Back Better agenda. The packages authorize new spending toward the expansion of health care, education, family leave, climate change initiatives, and more. 

Naturally, to fund this new spending, the bills have also included a multitude of new and expanded tax proposals for individuals and corporations. Significantly, many of these tax provisions have targeted IRAs, 401(k)s, Roth accounts, and other retirement savings vehicles. 

At a high level, these proposals represent a significant change in the way Washington views saving for retirement. Members of The House stated one goal of these initiatives, is to “avoid subsidizing retirement savings” once account balances reach high levels. In my opinion, Congress has shifted from incentivizing Americans to save for the future to penalizing Americans who have successfully saved. 


These new tax and spending provisions dramatically increase the legislative risk associated with Traditional and Roth retirement accounts. 

Legislative risk is the risk of Congress changing the rules, and those changes negatively impacting your retirement approach. As our elected officials pass new laws around retirement accounts, there is a risk those laws could leave savers with fewer retirement assets – and less retirement income – than planned. 

Many savers want to understand the complete set of risks they may face in retirement. Unfortunately, too many Americans do not fully understand legislative risk, and how it can impact their assets. 


With this in mind, let’s look at some of the new retirement tax proposals from Washington. 

In recent months, Congress has discussed a new Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) applicable at any age for certain savers. Essentially, any saver with combined retirement assets of $10 million or more (Qualified and Roth) must each year withdraw from their accounts 50% of the excess above the $10 million cap. 

This will convert those tax-advantaged funds into annually taxable funds. Another proposal stipulates that once a saver reaches $10 million in retirement funds, they will be prohibited from saving any additional funds in traditional or Roth accounts – regardless of their age or career status. 

Finally, Congress has discussed limiting the ability of certain savers to convert tax-deferred assets into Roth accounts. For couples filing jointly with more than $450,000 in income (or individuals with more than $400,000 in income), Roth conversions from qualified accounts would be prohibited, so those savers could not transform tax-deferred funds into tax-free funds. 


A few important thoughts on these proposals and new bills we may see in the months ahead. 

Some in the media have suggested that savers with lower retirement assets don’t need to worry about the tax changes discussed in these proposals. However, this is where the talking heads don’t fully understand legislative risk. 

As we work to mitigate legislative risk in our retirement approaches, we must consider not just the provisions being discussed today, but how those provisions may develop, expand, and change in the future. This is especially true for Qualified and Roth accounts, where new laws can take immediate effect. 

In these accounts, savers could find themselves accessing their retirement funds under a completely different set of rules than they were promised when saving those funds. 

Why do I feel so strongly the legislative risk of Qualified and Roth accounts has increased dramatically in today's legislative environment? 

As is often the case with federal legislation, the challenge is getting a new framework passed into law. In this case, the challenge is getting the House and Senate to agree we should limit the growth and value of retirement accounts. 

Less challenging, in my opinion, is the task of simply choosing the limit. In recent discussions, Congress chose a cap of $10 million in retirement assets. However, I believe that number could easily be adjusted down in the future – to $8 million, or $5 million, for example. 

Again, the challenge is enacting into law the framework to limit account size. After that, it’s just about picking the size. 

Many experts agree Congress will need to raise additional tax revenue in the near term. Our national debt has swelled to more than $28 trillion. 

Politicians have acknowledged the tax provisions in these bills fall short of raising enough revenue to cover their price tags. What’s more, the bills are riddled with "trick accounting" to hide their true cost. 

Congress has artificially lowered the price tags on these bills by phasing out some of the social welfare benefits a few years down the road. 

However, as we all know, once a new benefit is in place, it is politically challenging to eliminate it. President Biden has said this bill will have a zero-dollar cost, indicating his commitment to raising additional tax revenue to fund this new spending. 

Simply put, there’s every reason to believe Washington will be searching for more tax revenue in the near term. And recent Congressional debate shows retirement accounts are a key place Congress may look. 


So, what does this mean for American savers? 

If you want to address the complete set of risks potentially facing your retirement funds, you may want to consider strategies that mitigate tax and legislative risk. 

Many savers choose to address the risk of variable taxes in retirement by incorporating tax-free strategies into their retirement approaches. 

As recent Congressional debate shows us, now is an important time to consider the kinds of tax-free vehicles you use for tax diversification and assess the legislative risk these vehicles carry. 

Many savers have leaned heavily on Roth accounts to protect their retirement assets from rising taxes in retirement. But as we’ve seen with the recent tax and spending bills, Roth accounts are susceptible to legislative changes. 


One alternate strategy some savers have incorporated into their own savings approaches is the use 7702 Plans. Some savers have chosen this approach to help protect a portion of their funds from legislative risk. The legislative risk of 7702 Plans was not heightened by any of the tax and spending bills. In fact, I believe this new approach to taxing retirement accounts has strengthened the value 7702 Plans may deliver. 

As we've seen, Congress is looking to raise billions of dollars in new taxes from 401(k)s, IRAs, and Roth accounts. They've proposed changing multiple sections of the tax code. But which section isn’t mentioned once? IRC Title 26, Sec. 7702 – what we just talked about. 

It's worth noting that the account value of a 7702 Plan is not counted towards Congress’s arbitrary cap on assets under this bill, whether that cap ultimately lands at $10 million, $5 million, or any other amount. 

Additionally, I believe 7702 Plans are less susceptible to legislative risk than are Qualified and Roth accounts. That’s because these plans are private contracts, not accounts.

There is a significant difference between legislative changes to accounts and legislative changes to contracts. No matter what laws were in place when you started saving in a Qualified or Roth account, Congress can change the rules – and those changes can take place immediately. However, the courts have repeatedly upheld a different set of rules for contracts. 

Legislative changes to private contracts can only be implemented for contracts going forward –they cannot change contracts already in place. This means if Congress changes the rules for 7702 Plans, would likely only impact contracts issued at later dates – and savers already having 7702 Plans would experience no change. 

In this way, some savers may use 7702 Plans as a hedge against both rising taxes and legislative changes. If this is a strategy that appeals to you, please consult a qualified financial professional about your individual situation. 


The debate in Washington has uncovered areas where Congress may be looking for new tax revenue in the years ahead - and retirement assets appear to be high on that list. I see a pattern emerging in Congressional thinking, where new spending requires new taxes – and new taxes often require identifying new areas to tax. 

One thing is clear to me: The legislative risk facing Qualified and Roth accounts is significantly higher today than at any time in recent memory. And if you aren’t prepared, you may not be protected. 

Reducing legislative risk is a natural evolution of preparing for retirement. Many savers address market risk through a balanced portfolio and asset allocation, and increasingly savers have sought to address income risk through annuities. Now, as you prepare for the complete risks of retirement, you may also need to address the tax and legislative risks. This would help you protect your retirement funds from the changes coming from Washington – now and in the years ahead.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Cory Carlton is the CEO & Co-Founder of Both Hands Financial Group. He specializes in tax-free retirement income planning by helping people of all income levels utilize 7702 Plans. This is one of Cory's passions and what he enjoys doing most with his clients. Legislative and tax risk are the most commonly overlooked risks to retirements and Cory hates the fact that Americans have been misguided and lied to about their options. By using 7702 Plans Cory has been able to help clients save hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxes, increase retirement income by 60% or more, eliminate market and legislative risk.